Justifying Oneself

European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 13 (1):27-38 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At present, the activity of justifying oneself is mostly discussed in psychology, where it is typically viewed as a negative or at least regrettable activity involving changing one’s attitudes, beliefs, and feelings in order to minimize psychological threats arising from cognitive dissonance. Yet there is conceptual space, even a need, for an analysis of justifying oneself that is more content-neutral in nature. In this paper I provide such an analysis. Along the way I also briefly canvass some of the empirical work on self-justification in psychology and gesture towards issues surrounding the normative significance of the practice of justifying oneself.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-15

Downloads
42 (#390,669)

6 months
10 (#308,815)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Piper
James Madison University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Autonomy in moral and political philosophy.John Christman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Epistemic and dialectical regress.Michael Rescorla - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):43 – 60.
Rationalization as performative pretense.Jason D'Cruz - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (7):980-1000.
Moral Clichés (or, How Not to Teach Ethics).Berel Lang - 2002 - Teaching Philosophy 25 (3):247-250.
Moral Clichés (or, How Not to Teach Ethics).Berel Lang - 2002 - Teaching Philosophy 25 (3):247-250.

View all 6 references / Add more references