Faith and Philosophy 4 (4):403-426 (1987)
The question is: how should a theist think of justification or positive epistemic status? The answer I suggest is: a belief B has positive epistemic status for S only if S’s faculties are functioning properly (i.e., functioning in the way God intended them to) in producing B, and only if S’s cognitive environment is sufficiently similar to the one for which her faculties are designed; and under those conditions the more firmly S is inclined to accept B, the more positive epistemic status it has for her. I conclude by making some qualifications and applications and exmaining some objections
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Epistemic Justification and Psychological Realism.James E. Taylor - 1990 - Synthese 85 (2):199 - 230.
Similar books and articles
The Role of Sensory Experience in Epistemic Justification: A Problem for Coherentism. [REVIEW]Richard Schantz - 1999 - Erkenntnis 50 (2-3):177-191.
Suing One's Sense Faculties for Fraud: 'Justifiable Reliance' in the Law as a Clue to Epistemic Justification.Christopher R. Green - 2007 - Philosophical Papers 36 (1):49-90.
Theism, Naturalistic Evolution and the Probability of Reliable Cognitive Faculties.Matthew Tedesco - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):235-241.
Religious Experience and the Evidential Argument From Evil.David Silver - 2002 - Religious Studies 38 (3):339-353.
Does the Theist Have an Epistemic Advantage Over the Atheist?D. Blake Roeber - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:305-328.
Can Religious Unbelief Be Proper Function Rational?Michael Czapkay Sudduth - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (3):297-314.
Added to index2010-01-29
Total downloads58 ( #87,874 of 2,152,218 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #185,125 of 2,152,218 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.