A Broader Discussion of Authorship

Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):389-398 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While it may be useful to consider the development of new topics in teaching the responsible conduct of research (RCR), it is perhaps equally important to reconsider the traditionally taught core topic areas in both more nuanced and broader ways. This paper takes the topic of authorship as an example. Through the description of two specific cases from sociocultural anthropology, ideas about credit and responsibility are examined. It is suggested that placing more focus on the array of meanings found in the act of authoring might help students see themselves as part of a wider community both of scientists and beyond science

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Standards of Scientific Conduct: Are There Any?Michael Kalichman, Monica Sweet & Dena Plemmons - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (4):885-896.
Group mentoring to Foster the responsible conduct of research.Caroline Whitebeck - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):541-558.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-04

Downloads
20 (#758,804)

6 months
4 (#1,005,419)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?