Feminist Legal Studies 22 (1):67-87 (2014)
AbstractIn this paper I examine the presence of rape myths and gender stereotypes, and the norms of sexuality they reflect and reinforce, in Croatian rape laws, as exemplified by the recent practice of the Zagreb County Court. I begin with a general discussion of the gendered myths and stereotypes that have shaped the content and application of the criminal law of rape everywhere. I then briefly introduce the definition of rape under the 1997 Croatian Criminal Code which was in force at the time of my research, after which I proceed to the critical analysis and the assessment of the Zagreb County Court practice. Next, I turn to the changes in the new Criminal Code to see how they address the identified problems. I offer a model of an affirmative consent standard, based on a communicative model of sexuality, which values reciprocal responsibility, communication and mutuality of sexual desire. I argue that this standard has greater potential to challenge rape myths and gender stereotypes and to promote sexual freedom and gender equality.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Thinking Sexual Difference Through the Law of Rape.Yvette Russell - 2013 - Law and Critique 24 (3):255-275.
Jurisdictions of Sexual Assault: Reforming the Texts and Testimony of Rape in Australia. [REVIEW]Peter D. Rush - 2011 - Feminist Legal Studies 19 (1):47-73.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rape Myths: Is Elite Opinion Right and Popular Opinion Wrong?Helen Reece - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (3):445-473.
Gender Neutrality, Rape and Trial Talk.Philip N. S. Rumney - 2008 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 21 (2):139-155.
Putting Gender Into the Definition of Rape or Taking It Out?: Masiya V Director of Public Prosecutions and Others, 2007 BCLR 827.Elsje Bonthuys - 2008 - Feminist Legal Studies 16 (2):249-260.
When Rape Isn't Rape: Court of Appeal Sentencing Practice in Cases of Marital and Relationship Rape.Philip N. S. Rumney - 1999 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (2):243-270.
A Most Detestable Crime: New Philosophical Essays on Rape.Keith Burgess-Jackson (ed.) - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Sexual Specificity, Rape Law Reform and the Feminist Quest for Justice.Louise du Toit - 2012 - South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):465-483.
Cultural Memory, Empathy, and Rape.Lisa Campo-Engelstein - 2009 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 16 (1):25-42.
The Trouble with Rape: Gender Matters and Legal `Transformations'. [REVIEW]Elena Loizidou - 1999 - Feminist Legal Studies 7 (3):275-297.
When Rape Isn't Rape: Court of Appeal Sentencing Practice in Cases of Marital and Relationship Rape.Pns Rumney - 1999 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (2):243-270.
Men in Groups: Collective Responsibility for Rape.Larry May & Robert Strikwerda - 1994 - Hypatia 9 (2):134 - 151.
The ‘Scottsboro Case’: On Responsibility, Rape, Race, Gender, and Class.Bat-Ami Bar On - 1999 - In Keith Burgess-Jackson (ed.), A Most Detestable Crime”: New Philosophical Essays on Rape. Oxford University Press.
A Philosophical Investigation of Rape: The Making and Unmaking of the Feminine Self.Louise Du Toit - 2009 - Routledge.
An Immodest Proposal: Foucault, Hysterization, and the "Second Rape".Laura Hengehold - 1994 - Hypatia 9 (3):88-107.