Inference to the best explanation: Is it really different from mill's methods?

Philosophy of Science 63 (1):65-80 (1996)
Peter Lipton has attempted to flesh out a model of Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE) by clarifying explanation in terms of a causal model. But Lipton's account of explanation makes an adequate explanation depend on a principle which is virtually identical to Mill's Method of Difference. This has the result of collapsing IBE on Lipton's account of it into causal inference as conceived by the Causal-Inference model of induction. According to this model, many of our inductions are inferences from effects to their probable causes, and Mill's Methods are canons to guide such inferences. Thus, Lipton's account of IBE fails to represent an advance over the already familiar Causal-Inference Model of induction
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289894
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,824
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Articles.Steven E. Tozer, Debra Miretzky, Steven I. Miller & Ronald R. Morgan - 2000 - Educational Studies 31 (2):106-131.
Johnson and the Soundness Doctrine.David Botting - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (4):501-525.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

243 ( #14,848 of 2,178,174 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,174 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums