Diversity and uniformity in genetic responsibility: moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people in Germany and Israel [Book Review]

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (4):433-442 (2009)

The professional and institutional responsibility for handling genetic knowledge is well discussed; less attention has been paid to how lay people and particularly people who are affected by genetic diseases perceive and frame such responsibilities. In this exploratory study we qualitatively examine the attitudes of lay people, patients and relatives of patients in Germany and Israel towards genetic testing. These attitudes are further examined in the national context of Germany and Israel, which represent opposite regulatory approaches and bioethical debates concerning genetic testing. Three major themes of responsibility emerged from the inter-group and cross-cultural comparison: self-responsibility, responsibility for kin, and responsibility of society towards its members. National contrast was apparent in the moral reasoning of lay respondents concerning, for example, the right not to know versus the duty to know (self-responsibility) and the moral conflict concerning informing kin versus the moral duty to inform (responsibility for kin). Attitudes of respondents affected by genetic diseases were, however, rather similar in both countries. We conclude by discussing how moral discourses of responsibility are embedded within cultural (national, religious) as well as phenomenological (being affected) narratives, and the role of public engagement in bioethical discourse
Keywords Genetic responsibility  Being affected  Public moralities  Cross-cultural bioethics  Germany  Israel
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-009-9215-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,293
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Handbook of Qualitative Research.N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln - 1994 - British Journal of Educational Studies 42 (4):409-410.
Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility.John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza - 1998 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):459-466.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Moral Responsibility of the Hospital.Richard T. De George - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):87-100.
Responsibility.Garrath Williams - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Genetic Enhancement and Moral Attitudes Toward the Given.Terrance Mcconnell - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (4):369-380.


Added to PP index

Total views
17 ( #503,528 of 2,271,450 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #265,242 of 2,271,450 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature