Logica Universalis 14 (1):27-50 (2020)

Authors
Stephen Read
University of St. Andrews
Abstract
Roger Swyneshed, in his treatise on insolubles, dating from the early 1330s, drew three notorious corollaries from his solution. The third states that there is a contradictory pair of propositions both of which are false. This appears to contradict what Whitaker, in his iconoclastic reading of Aristotle’s De Interpretatione, dubbed “The Rule of Contradictory Pairs”, which requires that in every such pair, one must be true and the other false. Whitaker argued that, immediately after defining the notion of a contradictory pair, in which one statement affirms what the other denies of the same thing, Aristotle himself gave counterexamples to the rule. This gives some credence to Swyneshed’s claim that his solution to the logical paradoxes is not contrary to Aristotle’s teaching, as many of Swyneshed’s contemporaries claimed. Insolubles are false, he said, because they falsify themselves; and their contradictories are false because they falsely deny that the insoluble itself is false. Swyneshed’s solution depends crucially on the revision he makes to the acount of truth and falsehood, brought out in his first thesis: that a false proposition can signify as it is, or as Paul of Venice, who took up and developed Swyneshed’s solution some sixty years later, puts it, a false proposition can have a true significate. Swyneshed gave a further counterexample to when he claimed that some insolubles, like future contingents, are neither true nor false. Dialetheism, the contemporary claim that some propositions are both true and false, is wedded to the Rule, and in consequence divorces denial from the assertion of the contradictory negation. Consequently, Swyneshed’s logical heresy is very different from that found in dialetheism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11787-020-00246-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,287
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A World of States of Affairs.John Heil & D. M. Armstrong - 1999 - Philosophical Review 108 (1):115.
Doubt Truth to Be a Liar.Graham Priest - 2007 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):541-544.
The Development of Logic.William Kneale & Martha Kneale - 1962 - Studia Logica 15:308-310.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Cretan Square.Jean-Yves Beziau & Jens Lemanski - 2020 - Logica Universalis 14 (1):1-5.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Paradoxy, Pravdivost a Korespondence V Sémantice Rogera Swynesheda.Miroslav Hanke - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (1):40-61.
Obligations, Sophisms and Insolubles.Stephen Read - 2013 - National Research University “Higher School of Economics” - (Series WP6 “Humanities”).
Formal Logic and Dialectics.Chou Ku-Ch'eng - 1969 - Chinese Studies in Philosophy 1 (1):5.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-02-06

Total views
3 ( #1,242,838 of 2,325,532 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #296,748 of 2,325,532 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes