The standard of care debate: the Declaration of Helsinki versus the international consensus opinion

Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):190-193 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The World Medical Association’s revised Declaration of Helsinki endorses the view that all trial participants in every country are entitled to the worldwide best standard of care. In this paper the authors show that this requirement has been rejected by every national and international committee that has examined this issue. They argue that the consensus view now holds that it is ethically permissible, in some circumstances, to provide research participants less than the worldwide best care. Finally, the authors show that there is also consensus regarding the broad conditions under which this is acceptable

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The 50th Anniversary of the Declaration of Helsinki: Progress but Many Remaining Challenges.J. Millum - 2013 - Journal of the American Medical Association 310 (20):2143-44.
Ethics briefings.Veronica English, Gillian Romano-Critchley, Julian Sheather & Ann Sommerville - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):275-276.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
42 (#390,194)

6 months
11 (#271,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Reidar Lie
University of Bergen