Synthese 144 (3):433-447 (2005)

Authors
John Roberts
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Abstract
I propose and motivate a new account of fundamental physical laws, the Measurability Account of Laws (MAL). This account has a distinctive logical form, in that it takes the primary nomological concept to be that of a law relative to a given theory, and defines a law simpliciter as a law relative to some true theory. What makes a proposition a law relative to a theory is that it plays an indispensable role in demonstrating that some quantity posited by that theory is measurable. In Section 1, I motivate the project of seeking a philosophical account of fundamental physical laws, as opposed to laws of nature in general. In Section 2, I motivate seeking an account with the distinctive logical form of the MAL. In Section 3, I present the MAL and illustrate the way it works by applying it to a simple example.
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Epistemology   Logic   Metaphysics   Philosophy of Language
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-005-5875-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is a Law of Nature?D. M. Armstrong - 1983 - Cambridge University Press.
Laws of Nature.John W. Carroll - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Logic in Reality.Joseph Brenner - 2008 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Laws and Lawlessness.Stephen Mumford - 2005 - Synthese 144 (3):397-413.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Puzzle About Laws, Symmetries and Measurability.John T. Roberts - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (2):143-168.
Laws and Dispositions.Andreas Hüttemann - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (1):121-135.
Volition and Physical Laws.Jean E. Burns - 1999 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (10):27-47.
Horgan and Tienson on Ceteris Paribus Laws.Marcello Guarini - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (2):301-315.
Physical Laws, Physical Entities and Ontology.E. Kaeser - 1977 - Dialectica 31 (3‐4):273-299.
Mathematical Biology and the Existence of Biological Laws.Mauro Dorato - 2012 - In D. Dieks, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel & M. Weber (eds.), Probabilities, Laws and Structure. Springer.
On the Status of Social Laws.Friedel Weinert - 1997 - Dialectica 51 (3):225–242.
The Constraint Interpretation of Physical Emergence.James Blachowicz - 2013 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44 (1):21-40.
Causal Overdetermination for Humeans?Michael Esfeld - 2010 - Metaphysica 11 (2):99-104.
The Impossibility of Psycho-Physical Laws.David Brooks - 1980 - Philosophical Papers 9 (October):21-45.
Anomalous Monism, Ceteris Paribus, and Psychological Explanation.Robert Klee - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (3):389-403.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
231 ( #49,318 of 2,519,861 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,861 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes