Reducing normative bias in health technology assessment: Interactive evaluation and casuistry

Abstract

Health technology assessment (HTA) is often biased in the sense that it neglects relevant perspectives on the technology in question. To incorporate different perspectives in HTA, we should pursue agreement about what are relevant, plausible, and feasible research questions; interactive technology assessment (iTA) might be suitable for this goal. In this way a kind of procedural ethics is established. Currently, ethics too often is focussed on the application of general principles, which leaves a lot of confusion as to what really is the matter in specific cases; in an iTA clashes of values should not be approached by use of such ethics. Instead, casuistry, as a tool used within the framework of iTA, should help to articulate and clarify what is the matter, as to make room for explication and consensus building

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,722

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
38 (#303,137)

6 months
1 (#388,319)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Assessing Health Technologies.Gert Jan van der Wilt, Rob Reuzel & H. David Banta - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1):101-113.
Technology as World Building.Anne Chapman - 2004 - Ethics, Place and Environment 7 (1-2):59 – 72.
The Moral Philosophy of Automobiles.Lantz Miller - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5):637-655.