Compromising Justice: Why the Bush Administration and the NGOs Are Both Wrong about the ICC

Ethics and International Affairs 20 (1):25-53 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The critics of the ICC in the Bush administration and its supporters within the human rights community have one thing in common: they assume that the ICC can evolve into an institution independent of states, either to constrain American power or to prosecute to end impunity for perpetrators.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The President of Good and Evil: The Ethics of George W. Bush.Peter Singer - 2004 - Ethics and International Affairs 18 (3).
American Social Sciences and the Bush Doctrine.Chao-wu Dai - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:1-9.
Military and Civil Reasons For Just Behavior in War.Ovadia Ezra - 2012 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 19 (2):39-49.
The Definition of Torture.Joseph Betz - 2006 - Social Philosophy Today 22:127-135.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#419,226)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Peaceful Transition and Retrospective Justice: Some Reservations.Brad R. Roth - 2001 - Ethics and International Affairs 15 (1):45-50.

Add more references