Meaning in Artificial Agents: The Symbol Grounding Problem Revisited

Minds and Machines 22 (1):25-34 (2012)
Authors
Abstract
The Chinese room argument has presented a persistent headache in the search for Artificial Intelligence. Since it first appeared in the literature, various interpretations have been made, attempting to understand the problems posed by this thought experiment. Throughout all this time, some researchers in the Artificial Intelligence community have seen Symbol Grounding as proposed by Harnad as a solution to the Chinese room argument. The main thesis in this paper is that although related, these two issues present different problems in the framework presented by Harnad himself. The work presented here attempts to shed some light on the relationship between John Searle’s intentionality notion and Harnad’s Symbol Grounding Problem
Keywords Chinese room argument  Symbol grounding problem
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11023-011-9263-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,425
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Minds, Brains and Programs.John R. Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):873 - 887.
Computing Machinery and Intelligence.Alan M. Turing - 1950 - Mind 59 (October):433-60.
The Symbol Grounding Problem.Stevan Harnad - 1990 - Physica D 42:335-346.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Minds, Machines and Searle.Stevan Harnad - 1989 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1 (4):5-25.
Grounding Symbols in Sensorimotor Categories with Neural Networks.Stevan Harnad - 1995 - Institute of Electrical Engineers Colloquium on "Grounding Representations.
Minds, Machines and Searle.Stevan Harnad - 1989 - Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Artificial Intelligence 1:5-25.
What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument?Stevan Harnad - 2001 - In Michael A. Bishop & John M. Preston (eds.), [Book Chapter] (in Press). Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-12-05

Total downloads
77 ( #81,137 of 2,267,195 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #66,720 of 2,267,195 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature