What do we hope for?: Some puzzles involving propositional hoping

Grazer Philosophische Studien 11 (1):75-92 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In at least some cases of future directed propositional hoping, facts about the hoper become puzzling if one supposes that the object of hoping is a future tensed proposition. These facts are easily explained by the alternative suppostion that the hoper accepts a future tensed proposition but bears the hopingattitude toward a disjunctively tensed proposition. Parallel remarks apply to past directed and present directed prepositional hoping. Thus, at least some instances of hoping have as their objects disjunctively tensed rather than purely tensed propositions. Propositional remembering may possibly resemblepropositional hoping in this respect

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Do We Hope For?Margaret M. Rooney - 1980 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 11 (1):75-92.
Thinking About the Past Hoping for the Future.Susan Levy–Osborne - 2012 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 2 (3):5-7.
Tensed Facts and the Fittingness of our Attitudes 1.Kristie Miller - 2022 - Philosophical Perspectives 36 (1):216-232.
How to theorize about hope.Jack M. C. Kwong - 2022 - European Journal of Philosophy 30 (4):1426-1439.
Tensed Facts.Richard Swinburne - 1990 - American Philosophical Quarterly 27 (2):117 - 130.
Tensed Supervenience: A No‐Go for Presentism.Sam Baron - 2013 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (3):383-401.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#322,980)

6 months
8 (#505,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references