- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Human and Humanity that Differentiate Withholding from Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Therapy: An ECMO Bridge to Nowhere
American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):62-64 (2023)
Abstract
In this issue of American Journal of Bioethics, Childress et al. address one of the most challenging modern clinical ethical dilemmas: the awake, competent patient dependent on extracorporeal membr...My notes
Similar books and articles
The Moral Relevance of ECMO Bridge Maintenance.Andrew M. Courtwright - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):52-54.
The Divergence of Technical and Human Teleology.Roxanne E. Kirsch - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):38-41.
Ethical Issues in the Transition to ECMO as a Destination Therapy.Samuel N. Doernberg, Derek R. Soled & Robert D. Truog - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):18-20.
Ethical Withdrawal of ECMO Support Over the Objections of Competent Patients.Dominic Wilkinson, John Fraser, Jacky Suen, Mioko Kasagi Suzuki & Julian Savulescu - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):27-30.
When the Bridge Crumbles: Balancing ECMO-DT With Transplant Program Needs.Paul J. Hutchison, Neeraj Joshi & Katherine Wasson - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):49-51.
Battle of the Bridge: Ethical Considerations Related to Withdrawal of ECMO Support for Pediatric Patients over Family Objections.Jenny Kingsley, Emily R. Berkman & Sabrina F. Derrington - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):32-35.
Why Deny ECMO-DT to the Incapacitated?Kyle E. Karches - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):70-72.
Unilateral ECMO Withdrawal and the Argument From Distributive Justice.Daniel Edward Callies - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):72-74.
“Sorry, but the Ethicist Said Your Life Isn’t Actually Worth Living”: Misunderstanding Ethics and the Role of the Ethics Consultant.Andy Kondrat - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):24-27.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-05-25
Downloads
13 (#1,065,706)
6 months
6 (#587,779)
2023-05-25
Downloads
13 (#1,065,706)
6 months
6 (#587,779)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Principles of Biomedical Ethics: Marking Its Fortieth Anniversary.James Childress & Tom Beauchamp - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (11):9-12.
From Bridge to Destination? Ethical Considerations Related to Withdrawal of ECMO Support over the Objections of Capacitated Patients.Andrew Childress, Trevor Bibler, Bryanna Moore, Ryan H. Nelson, Joelle Robertson-Preidler, Olivia Schuman & Janet Malek - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):5-17.
Is withdrawing treatment really more problematic than withholding treatment?James Cameron, Julian Savulescu & Dominic Wilkinson - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (11):722-726.
Twenty-Five Years after Quinlan: A Review of the Jurisprudence of Death and Dying. [REVIEW]Norman L. Cantor - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (2):182-196.
Twenty-Five Years After Quinlan: A Review of the Jurisprudence of Death and Dying. [REVIEW]Norman L. Cantor - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (2):182-196.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-kftwx uwo