- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The nature of scientific models : Formal V material analogy
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 3 (1):63-80 (1973)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Michael Ruse, The Evolution Wars.M. Ghiselin - 2002 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24 (1):152-153.
Evaluating Formal Models of Science.Michael Thicke - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 51 (2):315-335.
The Gaia Hypothesis: Science on a Pagan Planet. [REVIEW]Graham Oppy - 2015 - Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences 2 (2):247.
Book Reviews : Is Science Sexist? And Other Problems in the Biomedical Sciences. BY MICHAEL RUSE. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel, 1981. Pp. xix + 299. Hardback, U.S. $42; paperback, U.S. $14.95. [REVIEW]Richard Burian - 1985 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 15 (1):111-114.
Book reviews : Is science sexist? And other problems in the biomedical sciences. By Michael Ruse. Dordrecht and boston: Reidel, 1981. Pp. XIX + 299. Hardback, U.s. $42; paperback, U.s. $14.95. [REVIEW]Richard Burian - 1985 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 15 (1):111-114.
Michael Ruse, Mystery of Mysteries: is Evolution a Social Construction? Reviewed by.Scott Woodcock - 2000 - Philosophy in Review 20 (3):214-216.
Is Science Sexist? And Other Problems in the Biomedical Sciences. Michael Ruse.Robert J. Richards - 1983 - Isis 74 (3):422-423.
Is Science Sexist? And Other Problems in the Biomedical Sciences by Michael Ruse. [REVIEW]Robert Richards - 1983 - Isis 74:422-423.
The Retorsive Argument for Formal Cause and the Darwinian Account of Scientific Knowledge.Michael Tkacz - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):159-166.
Michael Ruse's Design for Living.Robert J. Richards - 2004 - Journal of the History of Biology 37 (1):25 - 38.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
77 (#74,842)
6 months
7 (#1,397,300)
2009-01-28
Downloads
77 (#74,842)
6 months
7 (#1,397,300)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Darwin's debt to philosophy: An examination of the influence of the philosophical ideas of John F.W. Herschel and William Whewell on the development of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.Michael Ruse - 1975 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 6 (2):159-181.
Resources for Research on Analogy: A Multi-disciplinary Guide.Marcello Guarini, Amy Butchart, Paul Simard Smith & Andrei Moldovan - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (2):84-197.
How Did Darwin Arrive at His Theory? The Secondary Literature to 1982.David R. Oldroyd - 1984 - History of Science 22 (4):325-374.
‘Simple’ analogy and the role of relevance assumptions: Implications of archaeological practice.Alison Wylie - 1988 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2 (2):134 – 150.
References found in this work
Aspects of scientific explanation.Carl G. Hempel - 1965 - In Carl Gustav Hempel (ed.), Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: The Free Press. pp. 504.
The philosophy of biology.David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.) - 1973 - New York: Oxford University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo