Beyond A-Theory and the Block Universe: A non-circular derivation of “before”, change, and the local arrow of time

Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 34 (1):21-48 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article proposes a “third way” in the philosophy of time beyond A-theory and the block universe, in which time is understood as a purely local phenomenon. It does so by starting with simple metaphysical assumptions about substances and their properties. Based on these assumptions, the notions of “before”, of change, and of time as local quantification of change can be derived non-circularly, i.e. without invoking temporal concepts. I then proceed to prove the irreversibility of local time by showing that the propositional content of the local past cannot be changed, since this would imply a contradiction, whereas that of the future can. Time’s familiar asymmetric character, in particular the difference between the fixed past and the open or “branching” future, is therefore a non-illusory but purely local phenomenon. Such a model requires no past-present-future distinction valid for the entire cosmos, and is therefore consistent with special and general relativity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,218

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-18

Downloads
99 (#225,002)

6 months
2 (#1,352,106)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Saudek
University of Innsbruck

References found in this work

What Makes Time Special?Craig Callender - 2017 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Time, Tense, and Causation.Michael Tooley - 1997 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Real Time Ii.David Hugh Mellor - 1998 - New York: Routledge.
Objective Becoming.Bradford Skow - 2015 - Oxford: Oxford University Press UK.
Time and physical geometry.Hilary Putnam - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (8):240-247.

View all 27 references / Add more references