- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Tooley on Abortion and Infanticide
In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 275–276 (2011-09-16)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Tooley on abortion and infanticide abortion, controversial ethical questions facing philosophers Thompson, that the fetus is indeed a person Tooley's contention, that the fetus is not a person argument, distinguishing “human being” and “person” Tooley, arguing that it does not acquire a right to life Tooley, rejecting ideas of mere birth, as entity's rights fetuses, young infants and animals, having no moral rights
My notes
Similar books and articles
Abortion and Infanticide.Christina Hoff Sommers & Michael Tooley - 1985 - Hastings Center Report 15 (3):39.
Michael Tooley on Possible People and Promising.Helga Kuhse - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (3):353.
Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral: The impairment argument.Perry Hendricks - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (2):245-253.
The Fallacy of all Person-denying Arguments for Abortion.William Cooney - 1991 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 8 (2):161-165.
My body, not my choice: against legalised abortion.Perry Hendricks - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (7):456-460.
Interests in Abortion: A New Perspective on Foetal Potential and the Abortion Debate.Tracie Martin - 2000 - Routledge.
The Ethics of Abortion, Infanticide, and the Problem of the Internal Inconsistency of the Moral System.Ilya Glazunov - manuscript
The problems with utilitarian conceptions of personhood in the abortion debate.Daniel R. A. Cox - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (5):318-320.
Some comments on the paper 'after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'.Helga Kuhse - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):323-324.
Against the impairment argument: A reply to Hendricks.Joona Räsänen - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (8):862–864.
Clashes of consensus: on the problem of both justifying abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome and rejecting infanticide.Henrik Friberg-Fernros - 2017 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (3):195-212.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
10 (#1,184,994)
6 months
9 (#299,238)
2023-06-15
Downloads
10 (#1,184,994)
6 months
9 (#299,238)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-659b74868d-jrkjf uwo