- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Assessing the modified youngest-first principle and the idea of non-persons at the bedside: A clinical perspective
American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):52 – 54 (2010)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Valuing Lives and Allocating Resources: A Defense of the Modified Youngest First Principle of Scarce Resource Distribution.Ruth Tallman - 2012 - Bioethics 28 (5):207-213.
What is so important about completing lives? A critique of the modified youngest first principle of scarce resource allocation.Espen Gamlund - 2016 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37 (2):113-128.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ethics of Clinical Science in a Public Health Emergency: Drug Discovery at the Bedside”.Sarah Jl Edwards - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (9):W1-W3.
Let Us Be Fair to 5-Year-Olds: Priority for the Young in the Allocation of Scarce Health Resources.Kelsey Gipe & Samuel J. Kerstein - 2018 - Public Health Ethics 11 (3):325-335.
A Call for Multiple Means of Assessing Quality in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Katherine Wasson - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (3):44-45.
Finding the Right Tools for Assessing Quality of Clinical Ethics Consultation.David Magnus - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (3):1-2.
The Existential Crisis of Clinical Ethics Consultants.Claire Horner - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (4):64-65.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Principle of Equivalence Reconsidered: Assessing the Relevance of the Principle of Equivalence in Prison Medicine”.Fabrice Jotterand & Tenzin Wangmo - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (11):W3 - W4.
Methods of Conflict Resolution at the Bedside.Robert D. Orr - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (4):45-46.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-05-07
Downloads
18 (#828,658)
6 months
7 (#592,005)
2010-05-07
Downloads
18 (#828,658)
6 months
7 (#592,005)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
What is so important about completing lives? A critique of the modified youngest first principle of scarce resource allocation.Espen Gamlund - 2016 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37 (2):113-128.
Response to open Peer commentaries on “complete lives in the balance”.Samuel J. Kerstein & Greg Bognar - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):W3 – W5.
Reflective disequilibrium: a critical evaluation of the complete lives framework for healthcare rationing.Xavier Symons - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (2):108-112.
Acceptability, Equality, and Equity: A Fair Allocation Model for Scarce Healthcare Resources During Pandemics and Natural Disasters.Ercan Avci - 2022 - Türkiye Biyoetik Dergisi 8 (3):135-143.
References found in this work
Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions.Govind Persad, Alan Wertheimer & Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2009 - The Lancet 373 (9661):423--431.
Complete lives in the balance.Samuel J. Kerstein & Greg Bognar - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):37 – 45.
The concept of the person and the value of life.John Harris - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):293-308.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo