Binmore's Egalitarianism

Analyse & Kritik 27 (1):89-94 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this short commentary on Ken Binmore’s Natural Justice I primarily examine the relationship between mainstream egalitarian theories and Binmore’s ap- proach. I argue that Binmore uses key concepts in non-standard ways. As a result, he doesn’t engage enough with the views he criticises

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Kenneth Binmore’s Natural Justice.Douglass C. North - 2006 - Analyse & Kritik 28 (1):102-103.
Binmore’s Humeanism.Dieter Birnbacher - 2006 - Analyse & Kritik 28 (1):66-70.
Ken Binmore’s Natural Justice.Brian Skyrms - 2006 - Analyse & Kritik 28 (1):99-101.
Naturalism and Moral Conventionalism.Cyril Hédoin - 2018 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 11 (1):50-79.
Binmore, Boundedly Rational.Marlies Ahlert & Hartmut Kliemt - 2006 - Analyse & Kritik 28 (1):104-110.
The Psychology of Justice.Fiery Cushman, Liane Young & Marc Hauser - 2006 - Analyse & Kritik 28 (1):95-98.
Justice: Political Not Natural.Fabienne Peter - 2006 - Analyse & Kritik 28 (1):83-88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-09

Downloads
17 (#863,839)

6 months
7 (#592,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christoph Schmidt-Petri
London School of Economics (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references