The problem of free mass: Must properties cluster?

Abstract
Properties come in clusters. It seems impossible, for instance, that a mass could float free, unattached to any other property. David Armstrong takes this as a reductio of the bundle theory and an argument for substrata, while Peter Simons and Arda Denkel reply by supplementing the bundle theory with accounts of property interdependencies. I argue against both views. Virtually all plausible ontologies turn out to be committed to the existence of free masses.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy of Mind
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8205
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00246.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,696
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1994 - Routledge.
A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1993 - Philosophical Perspectives 7 (3):429-440.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Philosophers Should Prefer Simpler Theories.Darren Bradley - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies.
Two Ways to Particularize a Property.Robert K. Garcia - 2015 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (4):635-652.
Fundamentality And Modal Freedom.Jennifer Wang - 2016 - Philosophical Perspectives 30 (1):397-418.
The Location of Properties.Nikk Effingham - 2015 - Noûs 49 (4):846-866.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
160 ( #34,267 of 2,237,428 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #261,118 of 2,237,428 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature