Why preference-satisfaction cannot ground an egalitarian theory of justice

Journal of Social Philosophy 31 (3):294–306 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Coercion a Ground of Distributive Justice?Andrea Sangiovanni - 2016 - Law and Philosophy 35 (3):271-290.
Radical Egalitarian Justice.Kai Nielsen - 1979 - Social Theory and Practice 5 (2):209-226.
Extended Preferences and Interpersonal Comparisons of Well‐being.Hilary Greaves & Harvey Lederman - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (3):636-667.
Human Interests: Or Ethics for Physicalists.Joseph Mendola - 2014 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Relational Egalitarianism and the Grounds of Entitlements to Health Care.Brian Berkey - 2018 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 13 (3):85-104.
Why Rawls is Not a Cosmopolitan Egalitarian.Leif Wenar - 2006-01-01 - In Rex Martin & David A. Reidy (eds.), Rawls's Law of Peoples. Blackwell. pp. 95–113.
Contractualism, reciprocity, and egalitarian justice.Jonathan Quong - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (1):75-105.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
3 (#1,729,579)

6 months
32 (#106,387)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Walter Schaller
Texas Tech University

Citations of this work

Egalitarianismul.Eugen Huzum - 2013 - In Teorii si ideologii politice. Iasi: Institutul European. pp. 49-88.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references