In John Rawls’s The Law of Peoples we find unfamiliar concepts, surprising pronouncements, and what appear from a familiar Rawlsian perspective to be elementary errors in reasoning.1 Even Rawls’s most sensitive and sympathetic interpreters have registered unusually deep misgivings about the book.2 Most perplexing of all is the general character of the view that Rawls sets out to justify. For in this book Rawls, the twentieth century’s leading liberal egalitarian, advances a theory which shows no direct concern for individuals and requires no narrowing of global material inequality
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
There Are Peoples and There Are Peoples: A Critique of Rawls' Law of Peoples.Brian E. Butler - 2001 - Florida Philosophical Review 1 (2):1-24.
The Coherence of Rawls's Plea for Democratic Equality.Percy B. Lehning - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):1-41.
G. A. Cohen's Rescuing Justice and Equality - A Critical Engagement.Helga Varden - 2010 - Social Philosophy Today 26:175-189.
A Contradiction in the Egalitarian Theory of Justice.Michael W. Howard - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:35-55.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads166 ( #28,222 of 2,178,189 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,012 of 2,178,189 )
How can I increase my downloads?