Killing in War and Moral Equality

Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (4):495-512 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Do innocent civilians who will be killed in a justified attack on a nearby military target have a right to defend themselves by shooting down the bomber pilot? I argue that they do not, and that Jeff McMahan's view that they do have such a right—that there is a moral equivalence between pilot and civilian—is flawed in much the same way that Michael Walzer's moral equivalence of combatants—a position that McMahan has so persuasively refuted—is flawed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-17

Downloads
58 (#269,318)

6 months
11 (#340,569)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The basis of moral liability to defensive killing.Jeff McMahan - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):386–405.
Killing in self‐defense.Jonathan Quong - 2009 - Ethics 119 (3):507-537.
Abortion and self-defense.Nancy Davis - 1984 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (3):175-207.
The Just War and the Gulf War.Jeff McMahan & Robert McKim - 1993 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):501 - 541.
The Just War and The Gulf War.Jeff McMahan & Robert McKim - 1993 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):501-541.

View all 6 references / Add more references