Outsourcing Ethical Obligations: Should the Revised Common Rule Address the Responsibilities of Investigators and Sponsors?

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):397-410 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Common Rule creates a division of moral labor in research. It implies that investigators and sponsors can outsource their ethical obligations to IRBs and participants, thereby fostering a culture of compliance, rather than one of responsibility. The proposed revisions to the Common Rule are likely to exacerbate this problem. To harness the expressive power of the law, I propose the Common Rule be revised to include the ethical responsibilities of investigators and sponsors

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Participants' responsibilities in clinical research.David B. Resnik & Elizabeth Ness - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (12):746-750.
Where Did Informed Consent for Research Come From?Alexander Morgan Capron - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (1):12-29.
Learning Health Systems and the Revised Common Rule.Joshua A. Rolnick - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (2):238-246.
Public Health Data Collection and Implementation of the Revised Common Rule.Lisa M. Lee - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (2):232-237.
Currents in Contemporary Ethics.Mark A. Rothstein - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (1):154-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-27

Downloads
38 (#409,559)

6 months
9 (#436,380)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?