Hypatia 25 (3):577 - 609 (2010)

Authors
Abstract
Until now, philosophical debate about human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research has largely been limited to its ethical dimensions and implications. Although the importance and urgency of these ethical debates should not be underestimated, the almost undivided attention that mainstream and feminist philosophers have paid to the ethical dimensions of hESC research suggests that the only philosophically interesting questions and concerns about it are by and large ethical in nature. My argument goes some distance to challenge the assumption that ethical considerations alone must be foregrounded in philosophical discussions about hESC research by introducing a critical stance on the epistemological and ontological assumptions that underlie and condition it. A central aim of the paper is to show how Foucault's insights into knowledge-power, taken in combination with Hacking's claims about styles of reasoning, can make these assumptions evident, as well as cast light on their potentially deleterious implications for disabled people. Arguing in this way also enables me to draw out constitutive effects of research on stem cells, that is, to indicate how the discursive practices surrounding research on stem cells, as well as the technology itself, contribute to the constitution of impairment.
Keywords disability  Michel Foucault  embryonic stem cell research  ableism  Ian Hacking  biopolitics  diagnostic style of reasoning  constitution of impairment
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01118.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Health as a Theoretical Concept.Christopher Boorse - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (4):542-573.
The Taming of Chance.Ian Hacking - 1990 - Cambridge University Press.
Historical Ontology.Ian Hacking - 2002 - Harvard University Press.

View all 47 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Knowing Disability, Differently.Shelley Tremain - forthcoming - In Ian James Kidd, Jose Medina & Pohlhaus Jr (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. Routledge.
Feminist Philosophy of Disability: A Genealogical Intervention.Shelley L. Tremain - 2019 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):132-158.
Educating Jouy.Shelley Tremain - 2013 - Hypatia 28 (2):801-817.
Continental Approaches in Bioethics.Melinda C. Hall - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (3):161-172.
Philosophy of Disability as Critical Diversity Studies.Shelley Tremain - 2018 - International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies 1 (1).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-11

Total views
565 ( #12,270 of 2,445,466 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #17,629 of 2,445,466 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes