Biopower, Styles of Reasoning, and What's Still Missing from the Stem Cell Debates
Hypatia 25 (3):577 - 609 (2010)
Abstract
Until now, philosophical debate about human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research has largely been limited to its ethical dimensions and implications. Although the importance and urgency of these ethical debates should not be underestimated, the almost undivided attention that mainstream and feminist philosophers have paid to the ethical dimensions of hESC research suggests that the only philosophically interesting questions and concerns about it are by and large ethical in nature. My argument goes some distance to challenge the assumption that ethical considerations alone must be foregrounded in philosophical discussions about hESC research by introducing a critical stance on the epistemological and ontological assumptions that underlie and condition it. A central aim of the paper is to show how Foucault's insights into knowledge-power, taken in combination with Hacking's claims about styles of reasoning, can make these assumptions evident, as well as cast light on their potentially deleterious implications for disabled people. Arguing in this way also enables me to draw out constitutive effects of research on stem cells, that is, to indicate how the discursive practices surrounding research on stem cells, as well as the technology itself, contribute to the constitution of impairment.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01118.x
My notes
Similar books and articles
Creating donors: The 2005 swiss law on donation of 'spare' embryos to hESC research. [REVIEW]Jackie Leach Scully & Christoph Rehmann-Sutter - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):81-93.
Stem cell research: An ethical evaluation of policy options.Nikolaus Knoepffler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):55-74.
Stem Cell Research as Innovation: Expanding the Ethical and Policy Conversation.Rebecca Dresser - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):332-341.
Moral complicity in induced pluripotent stem cell research.Mark T. Brown - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 1-22.
International society for stem cell research (ISSCR) guidelines for the conduct of human embryonic stem cell research (december 2006).Bernard Dickens - unknown
Proliferating patent problems with human embryonic stem cell research?Matthew Herder - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):69-79.
Ethical issues in human embryonic stem cell research.Philip J. Nickel - 2008 - In Kristen Renwick Monroe, Ronald B. Miller & Jerome Tobis (eds.), Fundamentals of the Stem Cell Debate: The Scientific, Religious, Ethical & Political Issues. University of California Press.
Stemming the tide of normalisation: An expanded feminist analysis of the ethics and social impact of embryonic stem cell research.Shelley Tremain - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):33-42.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-11
Downloads
724 (#12,005)
6 months
93 (#9,591)
2010-08-11
Downloads
724 (#12,005)
6 months
93 (#9,591)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Knowing Disability, Differently.Shelley Tremain - forthcoming - In Ian James Kidd, Jose Medina & Pohlhaus Jr (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. Routledge.
Feminist Philosophy of Disability: A Genealogical Intervention.Shelley L. Tremain - 2019 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):132-158.
Philosophy of Disability as Critical Diversity Studies.Shelley Tremain - 2018 - International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies 1 (1).