Kantian Review 10:82-111 (2005)

The following remarks are intended to help clarify Kant's position on international right and, specifically, the so-called ‘right of war’. They are part of a more general study of Kant's politics; but I also make them here in the hope that Kant's view of international law can furnish us with some much-needed practical help and guidance. More specifically, I will try to show that Kant is less averse to the use of force, including resort to pre-emptive war, and far more attuned to possibilities for political catastrophe, than he is often taken to be. A greater appreciation for Kant's actual position can, I hope, make a small contribution toward mending the growing rift between so-called ‘Kantians’ who underrate the need for force, and self-styled ‘Hobbesians’ who underestimate the power of moral principle
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1369415400002144
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,241
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Kant's Critique of Hobbes.Howard Williams - 2003 - University of Wales Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
101 ( #89,839 of 2,325,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #135,836 of 2,325,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes