Perceived comfort level of medical students and residents in handling clinical ethics issues

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (1):55-58 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Background Studies have shown that medical students and residents believe that their ethics preparation has been inadequate for handling ethical conflicts. The objective of this study was to determine the self-perceived comfort level of medical students and residents in confronting clinical ethics issues. Methods Clinical medical students and residents at the University of Maryland School of Medicine completed a web-based survey between September 2009 and February 2010. The survey consisted of a demographic section, questions regarding the respondents’ sense of comfort in handling a variety of clinical ethics issues, and a set of knowledge-type questions in ethics. Results Survey respondents included 129 medical students (response rate of 40.7%) and 207 residents (response rate of 52.7%). There were only a few clinical ethics issues with which more than 70% of the respondents felt comfortable in addressing. Only a slight majority (60.8%) felt prepared, in general, to handle clinical situations involving ethics issues, and only 44.1% and 53.2% agreed that medical school and residency training, respectively, helped prepare them to handle such issues. Prior ethics training was not associated with these responses, but there was an association between the level of training (medical students vs residents) and the comfort level with many of the clinical ethics issues. Conclusions Medical educators should include ethics educational methods within the context of real-time exposure to medical ethics dilemmas experienced by physicians-in-training



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,271

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical practice in clinical medicine.William J. Ellos - 1990 - New York: Routledge. Edited by John Douard.
Phronesis in clinical ethics.Glenn Mcgee - 1996 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (4).
Complex ethics consultations: cases that haunt us.Paul J. Ford & Denise M. Dudzinski (eds.) - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lecture notes.Philip Howard - 2005 - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. Edited by James Bogle.
Medical ethics: a case based approach.Lisa Schwartz - 2002 - New York: WB Saunders. Edited by Paul E. Preece & Robert A. Hendry.
Case analysis in clinical ethics.Richard E. Ashcroft (ed.) - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Medical ethics.Alastair V. Campbell (ed.) - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The protection of patients' rights in clinical trials.Marek Czarkowski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):131-138.


Added to PP

40 (#383,189)

6 months
6 (#470,955)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?