In Ana Falcato (ed.), The Politics of Emotional Shockwaves. London: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 27-55 (2021)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Anger is often an appropriate reaction to harms and injustices, but is it a politically beneficial one? Martha Nussbaum (Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (1), 41–56, 2015, Anger and Forgiveness. Oxford University Press, 2016) has argued that, although anger is useful in initially recruiting agents for action, anger is typically counterproductive to securing the political aims of those harmed. After the initial shockwave of outrage, Nussbaum argues that to be effective at enacting positive social change, groups and individuals alike, must move quickly out of the state of anger. Feminist theorists (Frye, The Politics of Reality. Crossing Press, 1983; Lorde, 1997; Narayan, Hypatia 3 (2): 31–48, 1988) on the other hand have for long highlighted the efficacy of anger, as well as its moral and epistemic value, in fighting against the oppressive status quo. It might be thought therefore that for political action to be effective, a continued state of anger is preferable. Protestors must after all create and sustain a sense of moral obligation and justice. A main way of doing so is to promote successive moral shocks that trigger outrage (Jasper, Emotion Review 6 (3): 208–213, 2014). I present a novel, empirically informed defense of anger’s efficacy in political action. Nussbaum holds a traditional view on the nature of anger, inherited from Aristotle and the Stoics, which holds that anger constitutively involves a desire for retribution. The view that anger is counterproductive falls out of this and is dominant in academic work as well as in our personal and political lives. Based on work in social psychology, I argue that we need to reconsider this. In doing so, I highlight anger’s aim for recognition, rather than retribution, as key. Furthermore, I uncover conditions for anger’s political efficacy, as well as reasons for why the traditional view of anger has been so pervasive.
|
Keywords | anger oppression |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-56021-8_2 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition.James J. Gibson - 1979 - Houghton Mifflin.
View all 81 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Anger as a Political Emotion: A Phenomenological Perspective.Celine Leboeuf - 2017 - In Myisha Cherry & Owen Flanagan (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Anger. pp. 15-30.
Anger and Approbation.Lee A. Mcbride Iii - 2018 - In Myisha Cherry & Owen Flanagan (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Anger. New York, USA: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 1-13.
Anger and Oppression: A Tantric Buddhist Perspective.Emily McRae - 2019 - In The Moral Psychology of Anger.
Oppositional Anger: Aptness Without Appreciation.Tamara Fakhoury - 2021 - Social Philosophy Today 37 (1):107-125.
Characteristics of Anger: Notes for a Systems Theory of Emotion.Michael Potegal - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):215-216.
Anger and Economic Rationality.Daniel John Zizzo - 2008 - Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (2):147-167.
Forgiveness and the Multiple Functions of Anger.Antony G. Aumann & Zac Cogley - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy of Emotion 1 (1):44-71.
Righteous Indignation: Christian Philosophical and Theological Perspectives on Anger.Gregory L. Bock & Court D. Lewis (eds.) - 2021 - Fortress Academic.
The Moral Psychology of Anger.Myisha Cherry & Owen Flanagan (eds.) - 2017 - London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Personality Predictors of Anger. The Role of FFM Traits, Shyness, and Self-Esteem.Waclaw Bak - 2016 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 47 (3):373-382.
What Elicits Third-Party Anger? The Effects of Moral Violation and Others’ Outcome on Anger and Compassion.Helen Landmann & Ursula Hess - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (6):1097-1111.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2021-07-16
Total views
207 ( #56,712 of 2,520,398 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
87 ( #8,492 of 2,520,398 )
2021-07-16
Total views
207 ( #56,712 of 2,520,398 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
87 ( #8,492 of 2,520,398 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads