Permissible Epistemic Trade-Offs

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (2):281-293 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTRecent rejections of epistemic consequentialism, like those from Firth, Jenkins, Berker, and Greaves, have argued that consequentialism is committed to objectionable trade-offs and suggest...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-27

Downloads
99 (#55,386)

6 months
14 (#987,135)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel J. Singer
University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

Norms of inquiry.David Thorstad - forthcoming - Philosophical Topics.
How to be an Epistemic Consequentialist.Daniel J. Singer - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (272):580-602.
Epistemology.Matthias Steup - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
What’s Epistemic About Epistemic Paternalism?Elizabeth Jackson - 2021 - In Jonathan Matheson & Kirk Lougheed (eds.), Epistemic Autonomy. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 132–150.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations