Environmental Ethics 17 (2):151-169 (1995)
I discuss six problems with Warwick Fox’s “The Deep Ecology–Ecofeminism Debate and Its Parallels” and conclude that until Fox and some other deep ecologists take the time to study feminism and ecofeminist analyses, only disputes—not genuine debate—will occur between these two parties. An understanding of the six issues that I discuss is a precondition for such a debate
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Identification with Nature: What It is and Why It Matters.Christian Diehm - 2007 - Ethics and the Environment 12 (2):1-22.
Similar books and articles
Anthropomorphism Without Anthropocentrism: A Wittgensteinian Ecofeminist Alternative to Deep Ecology.Wendy Lee-Lampshire - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):91-102.
On Warwick Fox's Assessment of Deep Ecology.Harold Glasser - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (1):69-85.
Deep Ecology Versus Ecofeminism: Healthy Differences or Incompatible Philosophies?Robert Sessions - 1991 - Hypatia 6 (1):90 - 107.
Arne Naess, Val Plumwood, and Deep Ecological Subjectivity: A Contribution to the "Deep Ecology-Ecofeminism Debate".Christian Diehm - 2002 - Ethics and the Environment 7 (1):24-38.
Dōgen, Deep Ecology, and the Ecological Self.Deane Curtin - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (2):195-213.
Class, Race, and Gender Discourse in the Ecofeminism/Deep Ecology Debate.Ariel Salleh - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (3):225-244.
Deep Ecology and Ecofeminism: The Self in Environmental Philosophy.Colette Sciberras - 2002 - Dissertation, Lancaster
The Deep Ecology-Ecofeminism Debate and its Parallels.Warwick Fox - 1989 - Environmental Ethics 11 (1):5-25.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #171,870 of 2,172,662 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #75,840 of 2,172,662 )
How can I increase my downloads?