Leibniz et Ficino: vie, activité, matière. Leibniz und Ficino: Leben, Aktivität, Materie

Studia Leibnitiana 49 (2):243 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although Leibniz characterised himself in the “New Essays” as a “Platonic” as opposed to a “Democritean” philosopher, his intellectual relationship with the most famous of the Renaissance Neoplatonists, Marsilio Ficino, has received little attention. Here we review what can be thus far established regarding Leibniz’s acquaintance with portions of Ficino’s Opera omnia of 1576. We compare Ficino’s disenchantment with the atomistic materialism of Lucretius, which he had favoured in his youth, and his turn to Platonism for inspiration, with Leibniz’s own reported disenchantment with Gassendi’s Epicurean atomism and his invention of a vitalistic monadology that, despite Leibniz’s reservations regarding Ficinian magic, resembles Ficinian nature philosophy in number of striking respects.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Marsilio Ficino.Angela Voss (ed.) - 2006 - Berkeley, Calif.: North Atlantic Books.
Icastes: Marsilio Ficino's Interpretation of Plato's Sophist.Allen J. B. Michael - 2016 - Acmrs (Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance.
Eros/Ereos: Marsilio Ficino's Interpretation of Guido Cavalcanti's' Donna me prega.'.Massimo Ciavolella - 1986 - In Konrad Eisenbichler & Olga Zorzi Pugliese (eds.), Ficino and Renaissance Neoplatonism. Ottawa, Canada: Dovehouse Editions Canada. pp. 39--48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-08

Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Catherine Wilson
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references