Journal of Business Ethics 46 (2):143 - 150 (2003)

Authors
Abstract
There is a clear tendency in contemporary political/legal thought to limit agency to individual agents, thereby denying the existence and relevance of collective moral agency in general, and corporate agency in particular. This tendency is ultimately rooted in two particular forms of individualism – methodological and fictive (abstract) – which have their source in the Enlightenment. Furthermore, the dominant notion of moral agency owes a lot to Kant whose moral/legal philosophy is grounded exclusively on abstract reason and personal autonomy, to the detriment of a due recognition of the socio-historical grounds of moral social conduct.I shall argue that an adequate theory of responsibility is needed, which does not only take into account individual responsibility, but also collective and corporate responsibility, capable of taking into consideration society and its problems. Furthermore, corporations are consciously and carefully structured organisations with different levels of management and have clearly defined aims and objectives, a central feature upon which I shall be focussing in this paper.
Keywords agency  corporate moral agency  individual  individualist  moral responsibility  nominalists  realist
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1025061632660
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Why Corporations Are Not Morally Responsible for Anything They Do.Manuel G. Velasquez - 1983 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2 (3):1-18.
Individualism.Steven Lukes - 1974 - Political Theory 2 (4):449-450.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Fallacy of Corporate Moral Agency.David Rönnegard (ed.) - 2015 - Springer Netherlands.

View all 25 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
97 ( #122,094 of 2,519,866 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,866 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes