Francis Galton's theory of inheritance and the problem of unconceived alternatives

Biology and Philosophy 21 (4):523-536 (2006)
Elsewhere I have argued that the most significant threat to scientific realism arises from what I call the problem of unconceived alternatives: the repeated failure of past scientists and scientific communities to even conceive of alternatives to extant scientific theories, even when such alternatives were both (1) well-confirmed by the evidence available at the time and (2) sufficiently scientifically serious as to be actually embraced in the course of further investigation. In this paper I explore Francis Galton’s development and defense of his “stirp” theory of inheritance and conclude that this particular historical example offers impressive support for the challenge posed by the problem of unconceived alternatives while simultaneously showing how we can make that challenge deeper and sharper.
Keywords Philosophy   Evolutionary Biology   Philosophy of Biology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-005-9004-8
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,848
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Refusing the Devil's Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should We Take Seriously?P. Kyle Stanford - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S1-.
Natural Inheritance.Francis Galton - 1889 - Mind 14 (55):414-420.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
164 ( #31,045 of 2,210,428 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #225,618 of 2,210,428 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature