Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):339-350 (2011)

Religious voices were important in the early days of the contemporary field of bioethics but have now become decidedly less prominent. This is unfortunate because religious elements are essential parts of the most foundational aspects of bioethics. The problem is that there is an incommensurability between religious language and languages of public discourse such as the “public reason” of John Rawls. To eliminate what is unique in religious language is to lose something essential. This paper examines the reasons for the marginalization of religion in bioethics, shows the limitations of Rawls’s notion of public reason, and argues for a more robust role for theology in articulating a new language for public discourse in bioethics
Keywords Politics  Public discourse  Rawls  Bioethics  Religion  Bioethics: Medical ethics  Philosophy: Analytic philosophy  Health policy  Professionalism  The professions and inter-professionalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9323-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,959
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics.Onora O'Neill - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
The Birth of Bioethics.Albert R. Jonsen - 1998 - Oxford University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Homo Religiosus: The Soul of Bioethics.William E. Stempsey - 2021 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 46 (2):238-253.
What’s the Point of Philosophical Bioethics?Iain Brassington - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (1):20-30.
Bioethics Needs Religion.William E. Stempsey - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):17-18.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Religion and Bioethics: Toward an Expanded Understanding.Howard Brody & Arlene Macdonald - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (2):133-145.
Public Reason/Private Religion? A Response to Paul J. Weithman.David Hollenbach - 1994 - Journal of Religious Ethics 22 (1):39 - 46.
Reconciling Public Reason and Religious Values.James P. Sterba - 1999 - Social Theory and Practice 25 (1):1-28.
In Defense of Irreligious Bioethics.Timothy F. Murphy - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):3-10.
Religious Voices in Public Places.Nigel Biggar & Linda Hogan (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Theology's Role in Public Bioethics.Lisa Sowle Cahill - 2006 - In David E. Guinn (ed.), Handbook of Bioethics and Religion. Oxford University Press.
Religion, Theology, Church, and Bioethics.Martin E. Marty - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (3):273-289.
Religious Language.Michael Scott - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):505-515.
Against Public Reason Liberalism's Accessibility Requirement.Kevin Vallier - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):366-389.


Added to PP index

Total views
51 ( #222,081 of 2,504,833 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,833 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes