Van Inwagen's Consequence Argument against Compatibilism

In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 123–124 (2011-09-16)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: Van Inwagen's First Formalization.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Free Will and Miracles.Neal A. Tognazzini - 2016 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):236-238.
Van Inwagen’s Consequence Argument.Michael Huemer - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (4):525-544.
Kant’s Reply to the Consequence Argument.Matthé Scholten - 2021 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 29 (2):135-158.
Compatibilism and the consequence argument.Terence Horgan - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 47 (May):339-56.
Are we free to break the laws?David Lewis - 1981 - Theoria 47 (3):113-21.
Defending Lewis’s Local Miracle Compatibilism.Shane Oakley - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (2):337-349.
The Consequence Argument and the Definition of Determinism.Christopher Hughes - 2015 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 71 (4):705-724.
Tollensing van Inwagen.Harold W. Noonan - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (4):1055-1061.
Lehrer and the consequence argument.Danilo Šuster - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (1):77-86.
Van Inwagen’s Consequence Argument.Michael Huemer - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (4):525.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
12 (#1,077,002)

6 months
10 (#260,375)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Grant Sterling
Eastern Illinois University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references