Justifying group-specific common morality

Abstract
Some defenders of the view that there is a common morality have conceived such morality as being universal, in the sense of extending across all cultures and times. Those who deny the existence of such a common morality often argue that the universality claim is implausible. Defense of common morality must take account of the distinction between descriptive and normative claims that there is a common morality. This essay considers these claims separately and identifies the nature of the arguments for each claim. It argues that the claim that there is a universal common morality in the descriptive sense has not been successfully defended to date. It maintains that the claim that there is a common morality in the normative sense need not be understood as universalist. This paper advocates the concept of group specific common morality, including country-specific versions. It suggests that both the descriptive and the normative claims that there are country-specific common moralities are plausible, and that a country-specific normative common morality could provide the basis for a country's bioethics.
Keywords Morality  Common morality  Group-specific common morality  Country-specific common morality  Ethical justification
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11017-008-9058-0
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,091
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
The Foundations of Bioethics.H. Tristram Engelhardt - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Reason and Morality.Alan Gewirth - 1968 - University of Chicago Press.
Common Morality: Deciding What to Do.Bernard Gert - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals.Bernard Gert - 1997 - Oxford University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Common Morality and Moral Reform.K. A. Wallace - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):55-68.
Exploring Questions About Common Morality.Carson Strong - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):1-9.
Bioethics Policies and the Compass of Common Morality.Ronald A. Lindsay - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):31-43.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Common Morality and Moral Reform.K. A. Wallace - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):55-68.
Common Morality and Computing.Bernard Gert - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):53-60.
The Hedgehog and the Borg: Common Morality in Bioethics.John D. Arras - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):11-30.
Bioethics Policies and the Compass of Common Morality.Ronald A. Lindsay - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):31-43.
Egoism as a Theory of Human Motives.C. D. Broad - 1949 - Hibbert Journal 48:105-114.
Common Morality: Comment on Beauchamp and Childress.Oliver Rauprich - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):43-71.
A Defense of the Common Morality.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (3):259-274.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

63 ( #78,601 of 2,132,865 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

16 ( #35,260 of 2,132,865 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums