- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
How Not to Argue for Markets
Journal of Social Philosophy 48 (2):165-179 (2017)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
James Stacey Taylor, "Markets With Limits: How Commodification of Academia Derails Debate".Lamont Rodgers - 2022 - Philosophy in Review 42 (3):23-25.
Markets with Limits: How the Commodification of Academia Derails Debate, by James Stacey Taylor. New York: Routledge, 2022. 220 pp. [REVIEW]Joshua Stein - 2023 - Business Ethics Quarterly 33 (3):603-606.
Markets with Limits: How the Commodification of Academia Derails Debate. James Stacey Taylor, 2022. London and New York, Routledge. 234 pp, £120.00 (hb). [REVIEW]David Archard - 2022 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 39 (5):932-934.
James Stacey Taylor, Markets with Limits: How the Commodification of Academia Derails Debate. New York: Routledge. 234pp. ISBN: 9781003251996. US $48.95 (Pbk). [REVIEW]Stephen Kershnar - forthcoming - Journal of Value Inquiry:1-6.
Review essay: Stakes and kidneys: Why markets in human body parts are morally imperative, by James Stacey Taylor.Ph D. Amy E. White - 2005 - HEC Forum 17 (4):319-322.
Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy - Edited by James Stacey Taylor.Mikhail Valdman - 2007 - Philosophical Books 48 (4):371-373.
A Review of: “James Stacey Taylor, Stakes and Kidneys: Why Markets in Human Body Parts are Morally Imperative”: Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2005. 225 pp. $29.95, paperback. [REVIEW]Paul M. Hughes - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (2):93-94.
James Stacey Taylor, ed., The Metaphysics and Ethics of Death. Reviewed by.Eldon Soifer - 2017 - Philosophy in Review 37 (2):83-87.
The Limits of Anti-Anti-Commodification Arguments.Roderick T. Long - 2023 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 37 (2):1-10.
Limits to Markets with Limits, an Examination of James Stacey Taylor, Market with Limits: How the Commodification of Academia Derails Debate.Amy E. White - 2023 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 37 (2):11-16.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-06-22
Downloads
66 (#85,934)
6 months
5 (#1,552,255)
2017-06-22
Downloads
66 (#85,934)
6 months
5 (#1,552,255)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Effective Vote Markets and the Tyranny of Wealth.Alfred Archer, Bart Engelen & Viktor Ivanković - 2019 - Res Publica 25 (1):39-54.
Markets in votes: Alienability, strict secrecy, and political clientelism.Nicolás Maloberti - 2019 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 18 (2):193-215.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-xdvnm uwo