Rational Powers in Interaction: Replies to Paul, Andreou, Brunero, Mayr, and Haase

Philosophical Inquiries 11 (1):163-183 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A response to review essays by Chrisoula Andreou, John Brunero, Matthias Haase, Erasmus Mayr, and Sarah Paul on Sergio Tenenbaum's _Rational Powers in Action_

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Planning, time, and self-governance: replies to Andreou, Tenenbaum, and Velleman.Michael E. Bratman - 2021 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (9):926-936.
A critique of Habermas' theory of practical rationality.Nader Saiedi - 1987 - Studies in Soviet Thought 33 (3):251-265.
A critique of Habermas' theory of practical rationality.Nader Saiedi - 1987 - Studies in East European Thought 33 (3):251-265.
Two Approaches to Instrumental Rationality and Belief Consistency.John Brunero - 2005 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 1 (1):1-20.
Instrumentally Rational Myopic Planning.Chrisoula Andreou - 2004 - Philosophical Papers 33 (2):133-145.
Instrumental rationality, symmetry and scope.John Brunero - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (1):125-140.
Decision Theory.Lara Buchak - 2016 - In Alan Hájek & Christopher Hitchcock (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-09

Downloads
155 (#119,898)

6 months
64 (#69,915)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sergio Tenenbaum
University of Toronto, Mississauga

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references