The language of thought and the embodied nature of language use

Philosophical Studies 94 (3):237-251 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper attempts to clarify and critically examine Fodor's language of thought (LOT) hypothesis, focusing on his contention that the systematicity of language use provides a solid ground for the LOT hypothesis. (edited)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Critical Study of the Language of Thought Hypothesis.Jaime Ramos-Arenas - 2000 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
The languages of thought.Lawrence J. Kaye - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (1):92-110.
Systematicity redux.Brian P. McLaughlin - 2009 - Synthese 170 (2):251-274.
Global Aphasia and the Language of Thought.Fred Adams - forthcoming - Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science.
Global aphasia and the language of thought.Fred Adams - 2020 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 35 (1):9-27.
Between Fodor and Darwin.Bence Nánay - 2021 - In Judit Gervain, Gergely Csibra & Kristóf Kovács (eds.), A Life in Cognition: Studies in Cognitive Science in Honor of Csaba Pléh. Springer Verlag. pp. 175-184.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
10 (#1,222,590)

6 months
106 (#46,166)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?