Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (4):389-402 (2008)

This paper describes the author’s development and use of a diagramming model in preparing a legal case for which he was responsible. He combined Wigmorean analysis and object oriented techniques in order to model arguments based on generalisations taken from the real world and from legal precedent. The paper addresses the modelling issues, but in particular identifies the very real benefits that affected the way the case was conducted. Those areas in which the model came into its own were principally the structuring of evidence, the preparation for the cross-examination of witnesses, and ensuring a consistent approach from picking up the case to making the closing submissions.
Keywords Argumentation  Diagramming  Evidence  Modelling
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10506-008-9071-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge University Press.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
The Art of Memory.Ian M. L. Hunter & Frances A. Yates - 1967 - Philosophical Quarterly 17 (67):169.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On Computable Numbers with an Application to the AlanTuringproblem.C. F. Huws & J. C. Finnis - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (2):181-203.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Formalising Ordinary Legal Disputes: A Case Study. [REVIEW]Henry Prakken - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (4):333-359.
A Theory of Legal Reasoning and a Logic to Match.Jaap Hage - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):199-273.
The Result Model of Precedent.John F. Horty - 2004 - Legal Theory 10 (1):19-31.
Explanations in Search of Observations.Robert Sugden - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (5):717-736.
Ideal Objects as Models in Science.Władysław Krajewski - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2):185-190.
Teaching a Process Model of Legal Argument with Hypotheticals.Kevin D. Ashley - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (4):321-370.


Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #243,900 of 2,498,154 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,154 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes