Grazer Philosophische Studien 2 (1):105-132 (1976)

Abstract
The main sources here are Hume, Husserl, and De Finetti. The problem is how phenomenological investigation has to do with partial or probabilistic judgment. Behavioristic, frequentist and subjectivistic views are briefly surveyed. A variant of Hume's account of the probability of chances is developed with the help of De Finetti's concept of exchangeability. The question of transcendental elements in or behind partial judgment is considered in the light of understanding disagreement and error in partial judgment
Keywords Analytic Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0165-9227
DOI 10.5840/gps197627
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,078
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-04-04

Total views
12 ( #805,957 of 2,498,797 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,797 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes