Analyse & Kritik 33 (2):441-448 (2011)

Timothy Waligore
Pace University
In this article, I criticize Véronique Zanetti on the topic of moral compromise. As I understand Zanetti, a compromise could only be called a “moral compromise” if (i) it does not originate under coercive conditions, (ii) it involves conflict whose subject matter is moral, and (iii) “the parties support the solution found for what they take to be moral reasons rather than strategic interests.” I offer three criticisms of Zanetti. First, Zanetti ignores how some parties may not have reason to seek social peace at all. Zanetti’s claim that there is consensus on the aim of social peace can involve idealising away from disagreement in a manner that Zanetti accuses Rawls of. Second, even if there is consensus on the aim of seeking social peace, this leaves open the possibility of disagreement about which society different people should belong to. This idealises away from real world conflict concerning borders. Indeed, Zanetti does not mention that her ‘central example’ of moral disagreement, the German Abortion compromise, was enacted in the wake of German reunification. Third, there are at least two things that can be called the ‘German Abortion compromise.’ The compromise that Zanetti speaks of was imposed by the German Federal Constitutional Court. The court declared unconstitutional a law passed in 1992 that had been negotiated in parliament. Zanetti does not dwell on this lack of democratic credentials. Even the substance of the court-imposed solution is itself a dubious example of a moral compromise between parties based on what is acceptable to their reason. (penultimate version - If you would like the .pdf of the final version for personal scholarly use, please contact me through the email address on my profile or my CV.)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/auk-2011-0207
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Die Rechtfertigung moralischer Normen.Peter Stemmer - 2004 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 58 (4):483 - 504.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Justice, Peace and Compromise.Véronique Zanetti - 2011 - Analyse & Kritik 33 (2):423-439.
Women, War and International Law.Véronique Zanetti - 2010 - In Igor Primoratz (ed.), Civilian Immunity in War. Oxford University Press.
Veronique Zanetti.Entre Charybde et Scylla - 2005 - Studia Philosophica 64:237.
Integrity and Compromise in Nursing Ethics.Gerald R. Winslow - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (3):307-323.
Political Philosophy.Jonathan Gorman Véronique Zanetti - 2003 - Philosophical Books 44 (2):183-187.
Moral Compromise.David Archard - 2012 - Philosophy 87 (3):403-420.
Nomologie et anomie: lecture de deux antinomies.Véronique Zanetti - 1990 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 44 (4=175):581.
After 9-11 – A Paradigm Change in International Law?Véronique Zanetti - 2004 - In Mark Textor, Andreas Kemmerling & Georg Meggle (eds.), Ethics of Terrorism & Counter-Terrorism. De Gruyter. pp. 329-340.


Added to PP index

Total views
279 ( #32,210 of 2,439,094 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #14,539 of 2,439,094 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes