An Issue of Originality and Priority: The Correspondence and Theories of Oxidative Phosphorylation of Peter Mitchell and Robert J.P. Williams, 1961-1980 [Book Review]

Journal of the History of Biology 39 (1):125-163 (2006)
Abstract
In the same year, 1961, Peter D. Mitchell and Robert R.J.P. Williams both put forward hypotheses for the mechanism of oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria and photophosphorylation in chloroplasts. Mitchell's proposal was ultimately adopted and became known as the chemiosmotic theory. Both hypotheses were based on protons and differed markedly from the then prevailing chemical theory originally proposed by E.C. Slater in 1953, which by 1961 was failing to account for a number of experimental observations. Immediately following the publication of Williams 's hypothesis and before his own was published, Mitchell initiated a correspondence. Examination of the letters shows the development of a dispute based on the validity of the proposals, who should have priority and particularly whether Mitchell had drawn on Williams 's work without acknowledgement. We have concluded that Mitchell's proposals were original although it is evident that prior to the correspondence Williams had considered and rejected a proposition similar to Mitchell's theory. However, a major cause of the dispute was the difference in disciplinary backgrounds of Mitchell, a microbial biochemist and Williams, a chemist
Keywords bioenergetics  chemiosmotic hypothesis  chemiosmotic theory  Mitchell P.  originality  oxidative phosphorylation  plagiarism  priority  Williams R.J.P
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10739-005-3052-4
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,122
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Scientific Discovery: Logic and Tinkering.Aharon Kantorovich - 1993 - State University of New York Press.
L'histoire des Sciences Est-Elle Possible.S. Shapin - 1982 - History of Science 20:157-211.
Integrating Scientific Disciplines.William Bechtel (ed.) - 1986 - University of Chicago Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
On the Emergence of Living Systems.Bruce H. Weber - 2009 - Biosemiotics 2 (3):343-359.
Emergence of Life.Bruce H. Weber - 2007 - Zygon 42 (4):837-856.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total downloads
24 ( #215,709 of 2,191,272 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #144,833 of 2,191,272 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature