The Monist 82 (3):516-541 (1999)

Daniel Marc Weinstock
Université de Montréal
Recent defenders of nationalism have pointed to the fact that most people feel that their obligations towards their compatriots are either more numerous or more stringent than those which bind them to people from other countries. They point to this fact as evidence that something is seriously amiss with the universalism which allegedly underpins liberal theory. That people believe quite strongly that they have such special obligations is taken as a datum for which different theories of justice must somehow offer an account. It is taken to be a measure of the theoretical success of a theory of justice that what we might call the "special-obligations thesis" can be derived from it.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest  Philosophy of Mind  Philosophy of Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0026-9662
DOI 10.5840/monist199982320
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,133
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Motivating the Global Demos.Daniel Weinstock - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (1):92-108.
Cosmopolitan Impartiality and Patriotic Partiality.Kok-Chor Tan - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (sup1):165-192.
Compatriot Preference: Is There a Case?Richard Vernon - 2006 - Politics and Ethics Review 2 (1):1-18.
Liberal Nationalism, Immigration, and the Problem of Multiple National Identities.Lior Erez - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (4):495-517.
Against Institutional Conservatism.David V. Axelsen - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (6):637-659.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Troubled Reconciliation: A Critical Assessment of Tan’s Liberal Cosmopolitanism.Kathryn Walker - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (1):63-77.
Friendship Without Partiality?Troy Jollimore - 2000 - Ratio 13 (1):69–82.
Friendship and Partiality in Ethics.Christine Tappolet - 2008 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 3 (1).
Friendship, Virtue, and Impartiality.Diane Jeske - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):51-72.
What Do We Owe Others as a Matter of Global Justice and Does National Membership Matter?Gillian Brock - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (4):433-448.


Added to PP index

Total views
71 ( #150,482 of 2,448,174 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #451,050 of 2,448,174 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes