What can we Learn from Buridan's Ass?

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (3-4):281-301 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The mythical1 hungry ass, facing two identical bundles of hay equidistant from him, has engendered two related questions. Can he choose one of the bundles, there seemingly being nothing to incline him one way or the other? If he can, the second puzzle — pertaining to rational choice — arises. It seems the ass cannot rationally choose one of the bundles, because there is no sufficient reason for any choice.2In what follows, I will argue that choice is possible even when there is no option which is better than the others (section II), and that it is perfectly reasonable to choose an option even when there is no sufficient reason for it (section III). I will then (section IV) point to another puzzling feature of the ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Religious Pluralism and the Buridan's Ass Paradox.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 2009 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):1-26.
Buridan’s Ass and Reducible Intentions.Joe Mintoff - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:207-221.
Buridan's Ass: A Paradox Redux.Adebowale Oriku - 2008 - Philosophy Now 65:53-54.
God's problem of multiple choice.Lloyd Strickland - 2006 - Religious Studies 42 (2):141-157.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-24

Downloads
115 (#152,446)

6 months
22 (#119,581)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Beliefs and Intentions of Buridan's Ass.Nathaniel Sharadin & Finnur Dellsén - 2017 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3 (2):209-226.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man.Thomas Reid - 1785 - University Park, Pa.: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Derek R. Brookes & Knud Haakonssen.
Probability and the logic of rational belief.Henry Ely Kyburg - 1961 - Middletown, Conn.,: Wesleyan University Press.
Doxastic deliberation.Nishi Shah & J. David Velleman - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (4):497-534.
Logic of Statistical Inference.Ian Hacking - 1965 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
The theory of epistemic rationality.Richard Foley - 1987 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

View all 54 references / Add more references