Serious professional misconduct and the need for an apology
Clinical Ethics 5 (3):130-135 (2010)
Abstract
In this paper I argue that doctors who are found guilty of serious professional misconduct should be required to apologize as a condition of their registration. I argue that such a requirement is to be justified on the basis of the need to protect patients, maintain public confidence in the profession, and declare and uphold proper standards of conduct and behaviour. I also answer an objection that might be made to the position I defend. Finally, I consider whether there should be any exceptions to the demand for an apology from doctors who have been found guilty of serious professional misconduct.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1258/ce.2010.010030
My notes
Similar books and articles
Professional conduct and professional misconduct: A framework and its application to the accounting profession. [REVIEW]Ann Neale - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (2):219 - 226.
White collars, dirty hands: A grounded neo - institutional theory of misconduct in professional service firms.Pursey P. M. A. R. Heugens, Niki Den Nieuwenboer & M. Kaptein - manuscript
Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?Nicholas H. Steneck - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):161-176.
A rhetorical analysis of apologies for scientific misconduct: Do they really mean it?Lawrence Souder - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):175-184.
Innocence Denied: A Guide to Preventing Sexual Misconduct by Teachers and Coaches.William L. Fibkins - 2006 - Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Professors Behaving Badly: Faculty Misconduct in Graduate Education.John M. Braxton - 2011 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
Using Criminalization and Due Process to Reduce Scientific Misconduct.Benjamin K. Sovacool - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):W1-W7.
How Frequently do Allegations of Scientific Misconduct Occur in Ecology and Evolution, and What Happens Afterwards?Gregorio Moreno-Rueda - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):93-96.
Misconduct in science and the German law.Stefanic Stegemann-Bochl - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):57-62.
Research misconduct among clinical trial staff.Barbara K. Redman, Thomas N. Templin & Jon F. Merz - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):481-489.
The fallout: What happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?James S. Lubalin & Jennifer L. Matheson - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):229-250.
How to blow the whistle and still have a career afterwards.C. K. Gunsalus - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):51-64.
Scientific misconduct and findings against graduate and medical students.Debra M. Parrish - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):483-491.
Are physicians a “delinquent community”?: Issues in professional competence, conduct, and self-regulation. [REVIEW]Judith P. Swazey - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):581 - 590.
Professional Responsibility, Misconduct and Practical Reason.Chris Clark - 2007 - Ethics and Social Welfare 1 (1):56-75.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-14
Downloads
48 (#246,404)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2010-09-14
Downloads
48 (#246,404)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
References found in this work
Taking the sincerity out of saying sorry: Restorative justice as ritual.Christopher Bennett - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):127–143.