Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):757-774 (2013)

Abstract
We live in a world in which scientific expertise and its epistemic authority become more important. On the other hand, the financial interests in research, which could potentially corrupt science, are increasing. Due to these two tendencies, a concern for the integrity of scientific research becomes increasingly vital. This concern is, however, hollow if we do not have a clear account of research integrity. Therefore, it is important that we explicate this concept. Following Rudolf Carnap’s characterization of the task of explication, this means that we should develop a concept that is similar to our common sense notion of research integrity, exact, fruitful, and as simple as possible. Since existing concepts do not meet these four requirements, we develop a new concept in this article. We describe a concept of epistemic integrity that is based on the property of deceptiveness, and argue that this concept does meet Carnap’s four requirements of explication. To illustrate and support our claims we use several examples from scientific practice, mainly from biomedical research
Keywords Epistemic integrity  Research integrity  Scientific integrity  Deception  Biomedical research  Explication
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-012-9394-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,714
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logical Foundations of Probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Responsible Conduct of Research.Adil E. Shamoo - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
The Logical Foundations of Probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (13):362-364.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On Sporting Integrity.Alfred Archer - 2016 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 10 (2):117-131.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Co-Responsibility for Research Integrity.Carl Mitcham - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.
Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
An Introduction to Research Ethics.Paul J. Friedman - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):443-456.
The Integrity of Science: What It Means, Why It Matters.Susan Haack - 2007 - Contrastes: Revista Internacional de Filosofía:5-26.
Could Integrity Be An Epistemic Virtue?Greg Scherkoske - 2012 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2):185-215.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-10-06

Total views
36 ( #306,011 of 2,462,595 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,387 of 2,462,595 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes