Hostile Attribution Bias and Negative Reciprocity Beliefs Exacerbate Incivility’s Effects on Interpersonal Deviance
Journal of Business Ethics 120 (2):189-199 (2014)
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to examine the moderating roles of hostile attribution bias and negative reciprocity beliefs in the relationship between workplace incivility, as perceived by employees, and their interpersonal deviance. Data were collected using a three-wave survey research design. Participants included 233 employees from a large manufacturing company in China. Hierarchical regression analyses were used to test the hypothesized relationships. Our study revealed that hostile attribution bias and negative reciprocity beliefs strengthened the positive relationship between workplace incivility and interpersonal deviance. This relationship was the most positive when both hostile attribution bias and negative reciprocity beliefs were high. The findings provided evidence that directing employees to depress hostile attribution bias and negative reciprocity beliefs may attenuate the effects of workplace incivility on interpersonal deviance. Implications for theory, research, and management practice are discussed.
Similar books and articles
Understanding Bias in Scientific Practice.Nancy E. Shaffer - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):97.
Punish and Forgive: Causal Attribution and Positivity Bias in Response to Cat and Dog Misbehavior.D. W. Rajecki, Jeffrey Lee Rasmussen & Travis J. Conner - 2007 - Society and Animals 15 (4):311-328.
To Avenge or Not to Avenge? Exploring the Interactive Effects of Moral Identity and the Negative Reciprocity Norm.Laurie J. Barclay, David B. Whiteside & Karl Aquino - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 121 (1):15-28.
Reciprocity and Uncertainty.Yoella Bereby-Meyer - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):18-19.
The “Bias” Bias in Social Psychology: Adaptive When and How?James Friedrich - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):335-336.
Institutions and Deviance: Art and Psychiatry.Laurie Calhoun - 1994 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 8 (3):393-409.
Exploring Social Desirability Bias.Janne Chung & Gary S. Monroe - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):291 - 302.
Extremism and Deviance: Beyond Taxonomy and Bias.S. Alexander Haslam & John C. Turner - forthcoming - Social Research: An International Quarterly.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
You Abuse and I Criticize: An Ego Depletion and Leader–Member Exchange Examination of Abusive Supervision and Destructive Voice.Jeremy D. Mackey, Lei Huang & Wei He - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 164 (3):579-591.
Incivility’s Relationship with Workplace Outcomes: Enactment as a Boundary Condition in Two Samples.Jeremy D. Mackey, John D. Bishoff, Shanna R. Daniels, Wayne A. Hochwarter & Gerald R. Ferris - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 155 (2):513-528.
How and Why Non-Balanced Reciprocity Differently Influence Employees’ Compliance Behavior: The Mediating Role of Thriving and the Moderating Roles of Perceived Cognitive Capabilities of Artificial Intelligence and Conscientiousness.Nan Zhu, Yuxin Liu, Jianwei Zhang, Jia Liu, Jun Li, Shuai Wang & Habib Gul - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
An Ego Depletion Perspective Linking Political Behavior to Interpersonal Deviance.Jing Xiu, Junwei Zheng, Zhigang Li & Zhenduo Zhang - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
How Workplace Incivility Leads to Work Alienation: A Moderated Mediation Model.Bingnan Xia, Xiaochen Wang, Qing Li, Yuzhen He & Wei Wang - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
References found in this work
Forgiveness and Reconciliation in the Workplace: A Multi-Level Perspective and Research Agenda. [REVIEW]Michael E. Palanski - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (3):275-287.