Unrestricted Quantification and Reality: Reply to Kim [Book Review]
Acta Analytica 27 (1):77-79 (2012)
In my book, Worlds and Individuals, Possible and Otherwise , I use the novel idea of modal tense to respond to a number of arguments against modal realism. Peter van Inwagen’s million-carat-diamond objection is one of them. It targets the version of modal realism by David Lewis and exploits the fact that Lewis accepts absolutely unrestricted quantification. The crux of my response is to use modal tense to neutralize absolutely unrestricted quantification. Seahwa Kim says that even when equipped with modal tense, I am unsuccessful, given my view of reality and the proper use of modal tense in speaking of reality. I counter her attempt at resurrecting van Inwagen’s objection and clarify how we should use modal tense and how we should talk about reality
|Keywords||Modal realism Unrestricted quantification Modal tense Reality Existence Possible world|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Modal Tense and the Absolutely Unrestricted Quantifier.Seahwa Kim - 2012 - Acta Analytica 27 (1):73-76.
Modal Realism with Modal Tense 1.Takashi Yagisawa - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2):309-327.
Sets, Properties, and Unrestricted Quantification.Øystein Linnebo - 2006 - In Gabriel Uzquiano & Agustin Rayo (eds.), Absolute Generality. Oxford University Press.
'Now' and 'Then' in Tense Logic.Ulrich Meyer - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (2):229-247.
On the Size of Refutation Kripke Models for Some Linear Modal and Tense Logics.Hiroakira Ono & Akira Nakamura - 1980 - Studia Logica 39 (4):325 - 333.
Modal Fictionalism, Possible Worlds, and Artificiality.Andrea Sauchelli - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (4):411-21.
Added to index2011-07-23
Total downloads47 ( #107,991 of 2,152,625 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,806 of 2,152,625 )
How can I increase my downloads?