European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):65 - 84 (2010)
In this paper I examine the sixth century ’Rule of St. Benedict’, and argue that the authority structure of Benedictine communities as described in that document satisfies well-known principles of authority defended by Joseph Raz. This should lead us to doubt the common assumption that premodern models of authority violate the modern ideal of the autonomy of the self. I suggest that what distinguishes modern liberal authority from Benedictine authority is not the principles that justify it, but rather the first-order beliefs for the sake of which authority is sought by the individual, and the degree of trust between the authority and the subject
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Three Conceptions of Practical Authority.Daniel Star & Candice Delmas - 2011 - Jurisprudence 2 (1):143-160.
Authority in Educational Relationships.Jan Steutel & Ben Spiecker - 2000 - Journal of Moral Education 29 (3):323-337.
On Legitimacy and Authority: A Response to Krehoff.Bas van der Vossen - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (4):299-302.
Because I Said So: Toward a Feminist Theory of Authority.Rebecca Roman Hanrahan & Louise M. Antony - 2005 - Hypatia 20 (4):59-79.
Tradition, Authority and Originality in a Post-Critical Perspective.Zhenhua Yu - 2005 - Tradition and Discovery 32 (3):40-56.
Normative Authority for Empirical Science.Wim de Muijnck - 2011 - Philosophical Explorations 14 (3):263-275.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-04-27
Total downloads1 ( #876,129 of 2,164,555 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,950 of 2,164,555 )
How can I increase my downloads?